Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Not Candidates for Warfarin in Real-World Setting.

ABSTRACT: Limited literature has established the role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who are unsuited for warfarin. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to assess the effectiveness and safety of DOAC use in this vulnerable patient population. This was a retrospective propensity score matching cohort study. Among all patients aged 75+ years who were not candidates for warfarin, we matched those who initiated DOAC between September 2017 and September 2018 with those who did not receive DOAC or warfarin in a 1:1 ratio. Effectiveness outcome was a composite measure of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and pulmonary embolism. Safety outcome was a composite measure of non-trauma-related intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleed. Unless patients died or lost membership, follow-up period for the effectiveness outcome was until the end of 2019, whereas the safety outcome was for a period up to 1 year. Conditional logistic regression was used to analyze both outcomes. We identified 7818 patients who met the inclusion criteria and started DOAC, which matched to 7818 patients who did not receive anticoagulants. The mean age was 82.3 ± 5.1 years, and 51.5% male. The DOAC group had a lower hazard ratio of 0.37 (confidence interval, 0.24-0.57; P < 0.01) for composite effectiveness outcomes, whereas no difference in the composite safety outcome (hazard ratio, 0.91; confidence interval, 0.65-1.25; P = 0.55) when compared with matched control. In conclusion, DOAC was found to be effective in preventing thromboembolic events in patients aged 75+ years with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were not eligible for warfarin.

Cost-effectiveness of managing low-risk pulmonary embolism patients without hospitalization. The low-risk pulmonary embolism prospective management study.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the cost-effectiveness and difference in length-of-stay when patients in the ED diagnosed with low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) are managed with early discharge or observation. METHODS: Single cohort prospective management study from January 2013 to October 2016 of patients with PE diagnosed in the ED and evaluated for a primary composite endpoint of mortality, recurrent venous thromboembolism, and/or major bleeding event at 90 days. Low-risk patients had a PE Severity Index score < 86, no evidence of proximal deep vein thrombosis on venous compression ultrasonography of both lower extremities, and no evidence of right heart strain on echocardiography. Patients were managed either in the ED or in the hospital on observation status. Primary outcomes were total length of stay, total encounter costs, and 30-day costs. RESULTS: 213 patients were enrolled. 13 were excluded per the study protocol. Of the remaining 200, 122 were managed with emergency department observation (EDO) and 78 with hospital observation (HO). One patient managed with EDO met the composite outcome due to a major bleeding event on day 61. The mean length of stay for EDO was 793.4 min (SD -169.7, 95% CI:762-823) and for HO was 1170 (SD -211.4, 95% CI:1122-1218) with a difference of 376.8 (95% CI: 430-323, p < 0.0001). Total encounter mean costs for EDO were $1982.95 and $2759.59 for HO, with a difference of $776.64 (95% CI: 972-480, p > 0.0001). 30-day total mean costs for EDO were $2864.14 and $3441.52 for HO, with a difference of $577.38 (95% CI: -1372-217, p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low-risk PE managed with ED-based observation have a shorter length of stay and lower total encounter costs than patients managed with Hospital-based observation.

Value-based assessment of implementing a Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT).

PERTs are a new, multidisciplinary approach to PE care. They were conceived to efficiently identify and risk stratify PE patients and standardize care delivery. More research needs to be conducted to assess the effects that PERTs have had on PE care. This study sought to determine the effects of a PERT on quality and overall value of care. This was a retrospective study of all patients 18 years of age or older who presented with a principal diagnosis of an acute PE based on available ICD codes from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018. Patients who did not have an imaging study, i.e., CTPA or ECHO, available were excluded. Patients were divided into pre- (before October 2015) and post-PERT eras (after October 2015) and stratified based on the presence of right heart strain/dysfunction on imaging. All quality outcomes were extracted from the EMR, and cost outcomes were provided by the financial department. 530 individuals (226 pre-PERT and 304 post-PERT) were identified for analysis. Quality outcomes improved between the eras; most notably in-hospital mortality decreased (16.5 vs. 9.6) and hospital LOS decreased (7.7 vs. 4.4) (p < 0.05). Total cost of care also decreased a statistically significant amount between the eras. The implementation of a PERT improved quality and cost of care, resulting in improved value. We hypothesize that this may be due to more timely identification and risk stratification leading to earlier interventions and streamlined decision making, but further research is required to validate these findings in larger cohorts.

[The cost of pulmonary thromboembolism treatment]. / Pulmoner tromboemboli tedavisinde maliyet.

INTRODUCTION: Primary aim of this study is to determine the financial burden of Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA), low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) which are used in the treatment of the pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Secondary aim is to show long term complications of the treatment options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients who are diagnosed with PTE between May 2016 and March 2018 at Faculty of Medicine Karadeniz Technical University Hospital were observed prospectively. Hospitalization costs were calculated on patients who were treated only for PTE by hospitalized in the Chest Diseases Service in the acute period. Maintenance costs were calculated over all patients who regulary admitted to our outpatient clinic with the diagnosis of PTE. Data were presented as mean ± SD and median ± interquartilee range. A p-value of <0.05 was accepted to be significant. RESULT: Fifty five (37.2%) of the patients were male, 93 (62.8%) were female and the median age was 68 (range 18-95). The median hospitalization time and cost of patients who are discharged with VKA (n: 22) compared with patients discharged with LMWH (n: 22) was found to be increased (1316.82 TL 7,5 days / 803.36 TL, 5 days p<0.001). Statistical analysis could not be performed with NOAC (n: 2). In the analysis of sixth month costs, LMWH cost was found to be higher than VKA cost (6.927.15 ± 2.687.67 TL/698.29 ± 483.51 TL p<0.001). However VKA treatment tended to be less expensive than treatment with NOACs (698.29 ± 483.51 TL/1.050.81 ± 300.28 TL p= 0.140). CONCLUSIONS: In the acute period of PTE, VKA increases the length of hospitalization and hospital costs in patients treated at the hospital. In the maintenance period, VKA tends to have a lower cost compared to NOACs.

Outpatient Treatment in Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Receiving Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants Is Associated With Cost Savings.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are first line treatment for pulmonary embolism (PE). Treatment of acute PE is traditionally hospital based and associated with high costs. The aims of this study were to evaluate potential cost savings with outpatient DOAC treatment compared to inpatient DOAC treatment in patients with low risk PE. A retrospective study in patients with DOAC treated low risk PE (simplified pulmonary severity index [sPESI] ≤ 1) admitted to 8 hospitals during 2013-2015. Health care costs were compared in 223(44%) patients treated as outpatients and 287(56%) treated in hospital. Total cost per patient was 8293 EUR in the inpatient group, and 2176 EUR in the outpatient group (p < 0.001). Total costs for inpatients were higher (p < 0.001) compared to outpatients in both subgroups with sPESI 0 and 1. In multivariate analysis, type of treatment (in- or outpatient, p = < 0.001) and sPESI group (0 or 1, p = < 0.001) were associated with total cost below or above median, whereas age (p = 0.565) and gender (p = 0.177) was not. Adherence to guidelines recommending outpatient treatment with DOAC in patients with low risk PE enables significant savings.

Adoption of a dedicated multidisciplinary team is associated with improved survival in acute pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Acute pulmonary embolism remains a significant cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Benefit of recently developed multidisciplinary PE response teams (PERT) with higher utilization of advanced therapies has not been established. METHODS: To evaluate patient-centered outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a multidisciplinary PERT we performed a retrospective analysis of 554 patients with acute PE at the university of Virginia between July 2014 and June 2015 (pre-PERT era) and between April 2017 through October 2018 (PERT era). Six-month survival, hospital length-of-stay (LOS), type of PE therapy, and in-hospital bleeding were assessed upon collected data. RESULTS: 317 consecutive patients were treated for acute PE during an 18-month period following institution of a multidisciplinary PE program; for 120 patients PERT was activated (PA), the remaining 197 patients with acute PE were considered as a separate, contemporary group (NPA). The historical, comparator cohort (PP) was composed of 237 patients. These 3 groups were similar in terms of baseline demographics, comorbidities and risk, as assessed by the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI). Patients in the historical cohort demonstrated worsened survival when compared with patients treated during the PERT era. During the PERT era no statistically significant difference in survival was observed in the PA group when compared to the NPA group despite significantly higher severity of illness among PA patients. Hospital LOS was not different in the PA group when compared to either the NPA or PP group. Hospital costs did not differ among the 3 cohorts. 30-day re-admission rates were significantly lower during the PERT era. Rates of advanced therapies were significantly higher during the PERT era (9.1% vs. 2%) and were concentrated in the PA group (21.7% vs. 1.5%) without any significant rise in in-hospital bleeding complications. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, all-cause mortality in patients with acute PE has significantly and durably decreased with the adoption of a PERT program without incurring additional hospital costs or protracting hospital LOS. Our data suggest that the adoption of a multidisciplinary approach at some institutions may provide benefit to select patients with acute PE.

Cost-effectiveness microsimulation of catheter-directed thrombolysis in submassive pulmonary embolism using a right ventricular function model.

Approximately 30-50% of hemodynamically stable patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) have evidence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. These patients are classified as submassive PE and the role of reperfusion therapy remains unclear. We sought to identify the circumstances under which catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) would represent high-value care for submassive PE. We used a computer-based, individual-level, state-transition model with one million simulated patients to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the treatment of submassive PE with CDT followed by anticoagulation to treatment with anticoagulation alone. Because RV function impacts prognosis and is commonly used in PE outcomes research, our model used RV dysfunction to differentiate health states. One-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to quantify model uncertainty. Our base case analysis generated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $119,326 per quality adjusted life year. Sensitivity analyses resulted in ICERs consistent with high-value care when CDT conferred a reduction in the absolute probability of RV dysfunction of 3.5% or more. CDT yielded low-value ICERs if the absolute reduction was less than 1.56%. Our model suggests that catheter-directed thrombolytics represents high-value care compared to anticoagulation alone when CDT offers an absolute improvement in RV dysfunction of 3.5% or more, but there is substantial uncertainly around these results. We estimated the monetary value of clarifying the costs and consequences surrounding RV dysfunction after submassive PE to be approximately $268 million annually, suggesting further research in this area could be highly valuable.

Frequency of hospital readmissions for venous thromboembolism and associated hospital costs and length of stay among acute medically ill patients in the US.

Objectives: This study evaluated the frequency of hospital readmissions for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the associated costs and length of stay (LOS) among acute medically ill patients in the US using a real-world claims database analysis. Methods: Patients (≥40 years of age) at risk of VTE due to hospitalization for acute medical illnesses, based on primary hospital discharge diagnosis codes, were identified from the MarketScan databases between July 1, 2011 and March 31, 2015. Patients were required to have continuous insurance enrollment in the 6 months prior to initial (index) hospitalizations (baseline period) and in the 6 months after hospital discharge (follow-up period). The proportions of patients with VTE-related (diagnosis at any position) and VTE as primary diagnosis hospital readmissions during the follow-up period were evaluated. The associated costs and LOS for such readmissions were also determined, as well as time to VTE-related readmissions. Results: Of the study population (n = 12,785; mean age = 68.3 years), most were hospitalized primarily for infectious diseases (35.2%), followed by respiratory diseases (27.9%), cancer (15.7%), heart failure (11.8%), ischemic stroke (8.1%), and rheumatic diseases (1.4%). Of the overall study population, 2.1% (n = 268) had a VTE-related hospital readmission in the 6 months following discharge of their index hospitalization, of which 36.6% (n = 98) were for a primary diagnosis of VTE. Approximately 25.4% of the VTE-related hospital readmissions occurred within the first 30 days of discharge and 58.2% within 90 days. The mean cost for a hospital readmission with a primary diagnosis of VTE was $18,681 (mean LOS = 5.0 days); for readmissions with a primary diagnosis of DVT and PE, mean costs were $14,719 and $23,305, respectively. Conclusions: Among this study population of patients hospitalized for acute medical illnesses, some experienced a VTE event requiring re-hospitalization, with 25% occurring within the first 30 days after hospital discharge.

The implementation of a pulmonary embolism response team in the management of intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Massive and submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) can be life-threatening. Treatment options include anticoagulation, fibrinolysis, catheter-directed or open surgical thrombus removal, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. With increasing patient complexity and advanced therapeutic options, the approach to optimal care for patients with intermediate- to high-risk PE is not clearly established. Multidisciplinary, rapid response teams can optimize risk stratification and expedite management. A PE response team (PERT) composed of specialists from cardiology, vascular surgery, emergency medicine, pulmonary and critical care, interventional radiology, cardiac surgery, hospital medicine, and pharmacy was created at our institution. The team is tasked with evaluating and treating patients with massive and submassive PE by use of a risk stratification and treatment algorithm. We describe our initial experience with this approach. METHODS: The records of patients treated by the PERT since inception in October 2015 through May 2017 were reviewed (intervention group). The diagnoses codes of the PERT patients were retrieved from the Vizient database. A retrospective control cohort group was created using these specific diagnoses and a matching set of demographics (age, sex), Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group, admission severity of illness, and admission risk of mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test, the Pearson χ2 statistic, Student t-test, and Cochran-Cox approximation. P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: During the time interval, 77 patients with massive or submassive PE were treated by PERT activation; 992 patients included in the control group were treated at the discretion of an attending physician without use of the algorithm from October 2013 to 2016. Both groups had similar demographics, similar distribution of risk of mortality and severity of illness, and similar average Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group weighting. There was no statistically significant difference in the mortality rate between the two groups. The PERT group had significantly lower intensive care unit stay and overall length of stay. No difference was seen in direct cost between the two groups despite higher use of interventional treatment modalities in the PERT group. CONCLUSIONS: In our institution, assembly of a dedicated team to treat patients with massive or submassive PE according to a clinical algorithm resulted in expedited treatment and reduced variation of care. Intensive care unit stay and overall length of stay were reduced by this approach, with no impact on direct cost despite the use of advanced modalities of treatment. We believe that this paradigm can be of potential value in other disease entities, particularly when multiple disciplines are involved.

The value of sPESI for risk stratification in patients with pulmonary embolism.

INTRODUCTION: Various risk stratification methods exist for patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). We used the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) as a risk-stratification method to understand the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) PE population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients with ≥ 1 inpatient PE diagnosis (index date = discharge date) from October 2011-June 2015 as well as continuous enrollment for ≥ 12 months pre- and 3 months post-index date were included. We defined a sPESI score of 0 as low-risk (LRPE) and all others as high-risk (HRPE). Hospital-acquired complications (HACs) during the index hospitalization, 90-day follow-up PE-related outcomes, and health care utilization and costs were compared between HRPE and LRPE patients. RESULTS: Of 6746 PE patients, 95.4% were men, 67.7% were white, and 22.0% were African American; LRPE occurred in 28.4% and HRPE in 71.6%. Relative to HRPE patients, LRPE patients had lower Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (1.0 vs. 3.4, p < 0.0001) and other baseline comorbidities, fewer HACs (11.4% vs. 20.0%, p < 0.0001), less bacterial pneumonia (10.6% vs. 22.3%, p < 0.0001), and shorter average inpatient lengths of stay (8.8 vs. 11.2 days, p < 0.0001) during the index hospitalization. During follow-up, LRPE patients had fewer PE-related outcomes of recurrent venous thromboembolism (4.4% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.0077), major bleeding (1.2% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.0382), and death (3.7% vs. 16.2%, p < 0.0001). LRPE patients had fewer inpatient but higher outpatient visits per patient, and lower total health care costs ($12,021 vs. $16,911, p < 0.0001) than HRPE patients. CONCLUSIONS: Using the sPESI score identifies a PE cohort with a lower clinical and economic burden.

Analysis of venous thromboembolism in neurosurgical patients undergoing standard versus routine ultrasonography.

Routine screening of high-risk asymptomatic trauma or surgical patients for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is controversial. Studies suggest against screening while others recognize that some patients at high risk may benefit. The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the benefit of routine screening using doppler ultrasonography for the early detection of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in post-operative neurosurgical patients. This was a quasi-experimental study at a major academic tertiary care medical center. A total of 157 adults underwent cranial or spinal surgical interventions from March through August 2017 and received either standard screening (n = 104) versus routine ultrasonography screening (n = 53). There was no significant difference in incidence of DVT between the two groups: 11 (11%) in the standard screening group versus 5 (9%) in the routine screening group, p = 0.823. Upper and lower extremity ultrasonography was performed in 43 (41%) of the standard screening group versus 53 (100%) in the routine screening group, p < 0.001. DVT was identified in nearly one of every 6 ultrasonography screenings in the standard screening group versus 27 ultrasonography screenings required to identify one DVT in the routine screening group. There were the same number of screenings for upper extremity ultrasonography, but they did not yield or detect DVT; instead only superficial, untreatable, DVTs were reported. Total cost to diagnose one DVT, including screening and labor, averaged $13,664 in the standard group versus $56,525 in the routine group. Routine screening in neurosurgical patients who received VTE prophylaxis was not associated with lower incidence of VTE and mortality attributed to PE. Thus, routine screening may not be cost effective to prevent complications from DVT incidence.

Health-care Cost Impact of Continued Anticoagulation With Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin for Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic VTE in the EINSTEIN-CHOICE Trial Population.

BACKGROUND: Using data from the Reduced-Dose Rivaroxaban in the Long-Term Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (EINSTEIN-CHOICE) trial, this study assessed cost impact of continued anticoagulation therapy with rivaroxaban vs aspirin. METHODS: Total health-care costs (2016 USD) associated with rivaroxaban and aspirin were calculated as the sum of clinical event costs and drug costs from a US managed care perspective. Clinical event costs were calculated by multiplying event rate by cost of care. One-year Kaplan-Meier clinical event rates for recurrent pulmonary embolism, recurrent DVT, all-cause mortality, and bleeding were obtained from EINSTEIN-CHOICE. Cost of care was determined by literature review. Drug costs were the product of drug price (wholesale acquisition cost) and treatment duration. A one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban users had lower per patient per month (PPPM) clinical event costs compared with aspirin users ($123, $243, and $381 for rivaroxaban 10 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg, and aspirin, respectively). However, vs aspirin, PPPM total health-care costs were $24 higher for patients treated with rivaroxaban 10 mg ($143 higher for rivaroxaban 20 mg) due to higher cost of rivaroxaban. With a 15% discount for rivaroxaban 10 mg, the lower cost of clinical events for the rivaroxaban-treated patients more than fully offset the higher drug costs, and yielded a $19 lower total health-care cost. CONCLUSIONS: Continued therapy with rivaroxaban 10 and 20 mg vs aspirin was associated with lower clinical event costs but higher total health-care costs; with a 15% drug discount rivaroxaban 10 mg had lower total health-care costs than aspirin.

Trends in the use of echocardiography in pulmonary embolism.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a devastating diagnosis which carries a high mortality risk. Echocardiography is often performed to risk stratify patients diagnosed with PE, and guide management strategies. Trends in the performance of echocardiography among patients with PE and its role in influencing outcomes is unknown.We analyzed the 2005 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample Database to identify patients with primary diagnosis of PE or secondary diagnosis of PE and ≥1 of the following diagnoses: syncope, thrombolysis, acute deep vein thrombosis, acute cardiorespiratory failure, and secondary pulmonary hypertension. Trends in the performance of echocardiography and in-hospital mortality were analyzed. The admissions were divided into 2 groups with echocardiography, and without echocardiography, and 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for comparison. The primary end-point was in-hospital mortality. The secondary endpoints were length of stay and total hospitalization costs. Odd ratios (OR) with confidence intervals (CI) were reported.A total of 299,536 unweighted PE cases were studied. Performance of echocardiography among patients with PE patients increased from 3.5% to 5.6%, whereas in-hospital mortality decreased from 4.2% to 3.7% between years 2005 and 2014. Before matching, patients who received an echocardiogram were more likely to be younger, African American, admitted to a large, urban teaching institute, and had higher rates of concurrent acute deep vein thrombosis, and acute respiratory failure. Post-PSM, patients who received echocardiography during hospitalization had lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.68-0.83; P < 0.001), longer length of stay (median 6 days vs 5 days; P < .001) and higher mean hospitalization costs ($34,379 vs $27,803; P < .001) compared to those without echocardiography.Performance of echocardiography among patients with a PE is increasing and is associated with lower in-hospital mortality.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Routine Venous Doppler Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis at Admission to Inpatient Rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to identify whether timing of venous thromboembolism diagnosis is associated with differences in patient outcomes and to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of routine venous Doppler ultrasound at admission to inpatient rehabilitation, taking into account costs associated with prolonged inpatient rehabilitation length of stay, and development of pulmonary embolism. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of 2312 consecutive patient discharges from a single inpatient rehabilitation facility for an 18-mo period. Cost-effectiveness model was built using TreeAge Healthcare Pro. The base case was constructed using probabilities and inpatient rehabilitation length of stay identified from retrospective analysis. Cost of Doppler ultrasound was obtained through the literature, and daily inpatient rehabilitation cost was obtained from the study institution. RESULTS: Venous thromboembolism was diagnosed in 6.6% of patients. Asymptomatic patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism on screening Doppler ultrasound had shorter inpatient rehabilitation length of stay (P = 0.045) and lower rate of pulmonary embolism (P < 0.001) and acute hospital transfer (P = 0.002) than those diagnosed after clinical symptoms developed. Use of routine Doppler ultrasound at inpatient rehabilitation admission was found to be cost-effective, with a total cost of US $20,265 per admission compared with $20,269 per admission without use of Doppler ultrasound at inpatient rehabilitation admission. CONCLUSIONS: Routine Doppler ultrasound screening for venous thromboembolism at inpatient rehabilitation admission is associated with improved patient outcomes without added cost per admission.

The YEARS algorithm for suspected pulmonary embolism: shorter visit time and reduced costs at the emergency department.

Essentials The YEARS algorithm was designed to simplify the diagnostic workup of suspected pulmonary embolism. We compared emergency ward turnaround time of YEARS and the conventional algorithm. YEARS was associated with a significantly shorter emergency department visit time of ˜60 minutes. Treatment of pulmonary embolism was initiated 53 minutes earlier with the YEARS algorithm SUMMARY: Background Recently, the safety of the YEARS algorithm, designed to simplify the diagnostic work-up of pulmonary embolism (PE), was demonstrated. We hypothesize that by design, YEARS would be associated with a shorter diagnostic emergency department (ED) visit time due to simultaneous assessment of pre-test probability and D-dimer level and reduction in number of CT scans. Aim To investigate whether implementation of the YEARS diagnostic algorithm is associated with a shorter ED visit time compared with the conventional algorithm and to evaluate the associated cost savings. Methods We selected consecutive outpatients with suspected PE from our hospital included in the YEARS study and ADJUST-PE study. Different time-points of the diagnostic process were extracted from the to-the-minute accurate electronic patients' chart system of the ED. Further, the costs of the ED visits were estimated for both algorithms. Results All predefined diagnostic turnaround times were significantly shorter after implementation of YEARS: patients were discharged earlier from the ED; 54 min (95% CI, 37-70) for patients managed without computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and 60 min (95% CI, 44-76) for the complete study population. Importantly, patients diagnosed with PE by CTPA received the first dose of anticoagulants 53 min (95% CI, 22-82) faster than those managed according to the conventional algorithm. Total costs were reduced by on average €123 per visit. Conclusion YEARS was shown to be associated with a shorter ED visit time compared with the conventional diagnostic algorithm, leading to faster start of treatment in the case of confirmed PE and savings on ED resources.

Interventions to Reduce the Overuse of Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Imaging use in the diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism (PE) has increased markedly in the last 2 decades. Low PE prevalence and diagnostic yields suggest a significant problem of overuse. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the evidence associated with the interventions aimed at reducing the overuse of imaging in the diagnostic workup of PE in the emergency department and hospital wards. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and EBM Reviews from 1998 to March 28, 2017. STUDY SELECTION: Experimental and observational studies were included. The types of interventions, their efficacy and safety, the impact on healthcare costs, the facilitators, and barriers to their implementation were assessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seventeen studies were included assessing clinical decision support (CDS), educational interventions, performance and feedback reports (PFRs), and institutional policy. CDS impact was most comprehensively documented. It was associated with a reduction in imaging use, ranging from 8.3% to 25.4%, and an increase in diagnostic yield, ranging from 3.4% to 4.4%. The combined implementation of a CDS and PFR resulted in a modest but significant increase in the adherence to guidelines. Few studies appraised the safety of interventions. There was a lack of evidence concerning economic aspects, facilitators, and barriers. CONCLUSIONS: A combined implementation of an electronic CDS and PFRs is more effective than purely educational or policy interventions, although evidence is limited. Future studies of high-methodological quality would strengthen the evidence concerning their efficacy, safety, facilitators, and barriers.

Benefit of early discharge among patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism.

Clinical guidelines recommend early discharge of patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism (LRPE). This study measured the overall impact of early discharge of LRPE patients on clinical outcomes and costs in the Veterans Health Administration population. Adult patients with ≥1 inpatient diagnosis for pulmonary embolism (PE) (index date) between 10/2011-06/2015, continuous enrollment for ≥12 months pre- and 3 months post-index date were included. PE risk stratification was performed using the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Stratification Index. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare 90-day adverse PE events (APEs) [recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleed and death], hospital-acquired complications (HACs), healthcare utilization, and costs among short (≤2 days) versus long length of stay (LOS). Net clinical benefit was defined as 1 minus the combined rate of APE and HAC. Among 6,746 PE patients, 95.4% were men, 22.0% were African American, and 1,918 had LRPE. Among LRPE patients, only 688 had a short LOS. After 1:1 PSM, there were no differences in APE, but short LOS had fewer HAC (1.5% vs 13.3%, 95% CI: 3.77-19.94) and bacterial pneumonias (5.9% vs 11.7%, 95% CI: 1.24-3.23), resulting in better net clinical benefit (86.9% vs 78.3%, 95% CI: 0.84-0.96). Among long LOS patients, HACs (52) exceeded APEs (14 recurrent DVT, 5 bleeds). Short LOS incurred lower inpatient ($2,164 vs $5,100, 95% CI: $646.8-$5225.0) and total costs ($9,056 vs $12,544, 95% CI: $636.6-$6337.7). LRPE patients with short LOS had better net clinical outcomes at lower costs than matched LRPE patients with long LOS.

Relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic status and venous thromboembolism: results from a population-based study.

Essentials Literature on socioeconomic status (SES) and incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is scarce. We assessed neighborhood SES with VTE risk in a population of over 1.4 million inhabitants. Higher neighborhood SES was associated with lower incidence of VTE. These findings are helpful to inform policy and resource allocation in health systems. SUMMARY: Background The association between socioeconomic status and arterial cardiovascular disease is well established. However, despite its high burden of disability-adjusted life years, little research has been carried out to determine whether socioeconomic status is associated with venous thromboembolism. Objective To determine if neighborhood socioeconomic status is associated with venous thromboembolism in a population-based study from the Netherlands. Methods We identified all patients aged 15 years and older with a first event of venous thromboembolism from inhabitants who lived in the urban districts of The Hague, Leiden and Utrecht in the Netherlands in 2008-2012. Neighborhood socioeconomic status was based on the status score, which combines educational level, income and unemployment on a four-digit postal code level. Incidence rate ratios of venous thromboembolism were calculated for different levels of neighborhood socioeconomic status, with adjustments for age and sex. Results A total of 7373 patients with a first venous thromboembolism (median age 61 years; 50% deep vein thrombosis) were identified among more than 1.4 million inhabitants. Higher neighborhood SES was associated with lower incidence of VTE. In the two highest status score groups (i.e. the 95-99th and > 99th percentile), the adjusted incidence rate ratios were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-1.00) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69-0.93), respectively, compared with the reference status score group (i.e. 30-70th percentile). Conclusions High neighborhood socioeconomic status is associated with a lower risk of first venous thromboembolism.

National trends in hospitalizations for venous thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVE: The management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has evolved during the last decade. This study sheds light on the national trends in hospital admissions, outcomes, and economic burden for VTE. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was reviewed between 2003 and 2013 for hospitalizations for VTE, defined as admissions with a principal diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Outcomes measured were incidence, inpatient mortality, rates of interventions, hospital length of stay (LOS), and charges. A multivariate analysis was used to identify independent predictors of mortality in patients with VTE. RESULTS: There were 3,368,409 admissions for VTE (54% female; mean age, 62.9 years), at an average of 818 per 100,000 admissions per year. Hospitalizations for PE and VTE significantly increased (P < .01), with no change for DVT (P = .13). Use of catheter-directed thrombolysis increased (0.8% to 2.7%; P < .01), with no significant change in use during the study period (P = .10). The mortality associated with hospitalizations for VTE, PE, and DVT decreased (P < .01). Mean LOS decreased from 5.79 to 4.77 days (P < .01), whereas mean hospital charges increased from $29,755 to $39,171 (P < .01). At the national level, the economic burden of VTE hospitalizations increased from $7.8 billion in 2003 to $12.1 billion in 2013 (P < .01). Older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03), female gender (OR, 1.05), race (OR, 1.43 for Asian, 1.18 for African American, and 1.18 for Hispanic compared with white), PE (OR, 4.12), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥3 (OR, 2.75) were all predictors of inpatient mortality (P < .01 for all ORs). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalizations for VTE increased during the past decade, whereas mortality decreased. Despite a decrease in LOS, there is a rise in economic burden of VTE on the health care system.

Overall Effectiveness of Rivaroxaban in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism.

PURPOSE: Due to limited evidence on the impact of rivaroxaban in clinical practice, we compared the effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus standard of care (SOC) among patients in the Veterans Health Administration. METHODS: Adult patients with continuous enrollment in a health plan with medical and pharmacy benefits for ≥12 months before and ≥3 months after an inpatient diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) between October 1, 2011, and June 30, 2015, and a prescription claim for an anticoagulant during the index hospitalization, were included. SOC drugs were low-molecular-weight heparin, unfractionated heparin, and warfarin. Propensity score matching was used in comparing PE-related outcomes (recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and death), hospital-acquired complications (HACs), health care resource utilization, and costs among patients receiving SOC versus rivaroxaban. We defined net clinical benefit as 1 minus the combined rate of PE-related outcomes and HACs. FINDINGS: Among 6746 patients with PE, 208 received rivaroxaban, 4641 received SOC and 1897 received other anticoagulants. Most (95%) were male; 22% were black. After 1:3 propensity score matching, there were 203 rivaroxaban and 609 SOC patients. During the 90-day follow-up, rivaroxaban users had similar rates of PE-related outcomes, but fewer had experienced at least 1 HAC (10.3% vs 15.9%; P = 0.0506), resulting in better net clinical benefit (82.8% vs 71.1%; P = 0.001). Rivaroxaban users had fewer outpatient visits per patient (17.0 vs 19.9; P = 0.0005), a similar rehospitalization rate (0.2 vs 0.3; P = 0.084), lesser inpatient costs (US $3501 vs $6189; P < 0.0001), lesser inpatient costs and lesser total costs ($10,545 vs $14,192; P = 0.0002). When the sample was limited to patients with low-risk PE, we found similar patterns. IMPLICATIONS: Patients with PE prescribed rivaroxaban had similar PE-related outcomes, but fewer HACs and lesser total costs, than did patients on SOC.